AI Tools for Content Writing: ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini - Which One Delivers the Best Results?

AI tools are popping up everywhere, and they're changing how we do pretty much everything, especially writing. For those of us in marketing and comms, learning to use AI writing tools is becoming less of a "nice-to-have" and more of a necessity for staying competitive and efficient. According to the 11th Edition of the Annual Blogger Survey by Orbit Media, a whopping 80% of bloggers were using AI-powered content tools in 2024, up from 65% in 2023. That's a huge jump!

‍

‍

Personally, I'm convinced we need to get on board with AI tools for writing. It's not about replacing us, it's about making our lives easier. We should all be experimenting with these AI content generators and finding ways to integrate them into our workflows. Efficiency matters in professional settings. It's more about achieving the best results in a time-efficient manner than preserving the pride of crafting every word manually.

‍

‍

What AI Tools Should You Use For Writing

‍

While there are specialized AI writing tools designed specifically for content creation, such as Jasper AI and Copy.ai, large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini have become popular all-purpose AI content generators because they are free and flexible.

‍

In this article, I'm going to share my own experience using these three LLMs to generate the first draft of an article I wrote: 5 Free AI Tools to Supercharge Your Job Applications. To test their capabilities, I used the exact same prompt and outline with each tool to see how they stacked up. My comparison focuses primarily on writing quality and accuracy.

‍

‍

‍

Understanding Large Language Models (LLMs)

‍

Before diving into the comparison, let's briefly understand what LLMs are. Large language models are AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data that can generate human-like text, answer questions, translate languages, and complete various language tasks.

‍

These models work by predicting the next word in a sequence based on the words that came before it. Through extensive training on diverse text sources, they learn patterns, facts, and even some reasoning capabilities.

‍

ChatGPT for writing, Claude, and Gemini are all LLMs that use advanced natural language processing techniques, but each has its own distinct characteristics and strengths. People use these AI writing tools for everything from drafting emails and writing articles to brainstorming ideas and summarizing complex information.

‍

‍

Comparing the AI Content Generators

‍

ChatGPT: The Popular Pioneer

‍

What is ChatGPT?

ChatGPT is a generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) model developed by OpenAI. It excels at conversational tasks and creative writing, using deep learning and transformer neural networks to produce humanlike text. ChatGPT comes in different versions, with GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 being the most recent iterations.

‍

The Results

When I used ChatGPT for writing, here's what I found:

• Writing style: Straightforward, concise, and easy to understand, but a bit plain
• Headline quality: Generic and not particularly catchy
• Structure: A bit loose, with some points missing and a weak correlation between paragraphs
• Accuracy: Information might not always be accurate, so fact-checking is a must

Essentially, it got the general idea but lacked the finer details and flow.

‍

‍

Claude: The Thoughtful Storyteller

‍

What is Claude?

Claude is a family of LLMs created by Anthropic. It focuses on nuanced reasoning, detailed analytical work, and complex problem-solving. Claude models are trained using constitutional AI and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). The latest Claude 3 family includes three models: Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus, each optimized for different tasks and levels of complexity.

‍

The Results

Claude's AI-powered content had several distinctive characteristics:

• Length: Generated longer, more detailed passages
• Writing style: More vivid expressions, though sometimes a bit too flowery
• Structure quality: Better structure and correlation between paragraphs, with explanations of how different points connect
• Explanatory strength: Showed superior ability in expanding and elaborating my points logically
• Storytelling: More descriptive with better narrative flow
• Audience awareness: Strong emphasis on the non-technical nature of my audience, perhaps too intentionally
• Outline comprehension: Better understood my sometimes vague outline points
• Added value: Provided thoughtful, brief intros to every tool I mentioned, something the other AIs didn't do

‍

‍

Gemini: The Conversational Expert

‍

What is Gemini?

Gemini is Google's multimodal AI model family, designed to process multiple types of data including text, images, audio, and video. It's natively multimodal, meaning it can reason across different input data types. Gemini powers Google's AI chatbot (formerly known as Bard) and is being integrated into various Google services and products.

‍

The Results

Gemini's AI-powered content shared similarities with Claude's but had its own distinct traits:

• Overall quality: Generally similar to Claude in terms of completeness
• Writing style: Used vivid expressions that, again, occasionally became too flowery
• Explanatory strength: Showed good ability to expand and elaborate points logically
• Outline comprehension: Demonstrated good understanding of my outline points
• Tone: More conversational than the others, using "right?" and other questions frequently
• Headline creation: Generated the best article headline, effectively incorporating search terms and strong action verbs, making it both appealing and SEO-friendly

‍

‍

Which AI Writing Tool Should You Choose?

‍

After testing all three AI content generators with the same prompt, I've developed some preferences:

‍

• Claude excels with its thoughtful, human-like approach to explanation and article structuring. It seems to understand not just what I'm asking for but why certain elements matter in relation to each other.
• Gemini stands out with its conversational tone and ability to break down complex information into accessible, concise language. Its SEO-friendly headline creation is particularly impressive.
• ChatGPT produced content that was generic and repeatedly skipped important details from my outline, making it less suitable for my specific needs.

‍

For my own workflow, I decided to use Claude's version as a base and incorporate specific details from Gemini to create the final article. This hybrid approach leveraged the strengths of both AI writing tools.

‍

‍

How to Get Better Results from AI Writing Tools

‍

‍

Based on my experience, here are some tips to improve your results when working with AI writing tools:

‍

• Refine your prompts regularly: Be specific and clear. For example, I'm going to add specific instructions like "use plain language" to avoid flowery phrases that can make passages sound unnatural.
• Always fact-check: Carefully examine the generated content, ask follow-up questions, and verify information using reliable sources like Google or Perplexity.
• Edit before publishing: Regardless of which AI content generator you use, human editing remains essential for quality content.
• Improve readability: All the AI tools tended to create lengthy paragraphs. Break down these paragraphs into smaller, more digestible chunks that are easier to read online.

‍

***********

Last Update: 02/27/2025